TOGAF Practice Exam 2025 – The All-in-One Guide to Master The Open Group Architecture Framework!

In an Architecture Compliance Review, the Architecture Board holds the responsibility for accepting and signing off on the review. This group typically consists of senior stakeholders and experts who oversee architectural governance within an organization. Their primary function is to ensure that architectural decisions align with the broader organizational strategy and frameworks, such as TOGAF.

The Architecture Board evaluates the compliance of projects or initiatives against the defined architecture principles and standards. By having this level of authority involved in the sign-off process, it strengthens the governance structure and ensures that a consistent approach is followed across the organization. This accountability also helps in mitigating risks associated with architectural decisions and enhances the overall quality of the architecture produced.

Other options, while relevant to the architecture process, do not possess the final authority to accept or reject an architecture compliance review. The Architecture Review Coordinator, for instance, facilitates the process and ensures all necessary documentation is in order but does not have the sign-off authority. Similarly, the Lead Enterprise Architect and the Project Leader play crucial roles in the architecture and project management processes, respectively, but the ultimate agreement and accountability rest with the Architecture Board.