The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF) Practice Exam

When an implementation has no features in common with the architecture specification, it is categorized as:

1. Compliant

2. Conformant

3. Irrelevant

4. Non-conformant

The correct answer is: Irrelevant

When an implementation has no features in common with the architecture specification, it falls under the category of non-conformant. This means that the implementation does not align with or adhere to the standards and guidelines set forth in the architecture specification. In the context of TOGAF, conformant and compliant implementations demonstrate alignment with the architecture, while non-conformant indicates that the implementation lacks any relevant features outlined in the architecture. The term "non-conformant" clearly conveys that there is a lack of alignment, as an implementation that is considered conformant typically shows some level of relationship or integration with the specified architectural features. Therefore, identifying an implementation as non-conformant reinforces the idea that it diverges completely from the envisioned architecture, highlighting its inadequacy in terms of compliance with established specifications.